Security

Lebanese army seen as key force to secure national sovereignty

Backed by public trust and a long record of defending stability, the Lebanese Army is seen as the key force to secure the country and confront threats.

A Lebanese Army 6th Brigade convoy, flying the national flag, drives across an ISIS-held hill captured in Ras Baalbeck near the Syrian border. [Patrick Baz/AFP]
A Lebanese Army 6th Brigade convoy, flying the national flag, drives across an ISIS-held hill captured in Ras Baalbeck near the Syrian border. [Patrick Baz/AFP]

By Al-Fassel |

The Lebanese Armed Forces occupy a distinctive position across the national security landscape as a respected pillar preserving institutional stability.

Domestic observers increasingly expect military units to shoulder broadened security mandates while extending authority over all sovereign Lebanese territory.

Although French authorities formed initial colonial predecessor units in 1916, sovereign leadership officially established the Lebanese Army on August 1, 1945.

Earlier transitional arrangements consolidated local combat formations into the Fifth Brigade when the nation declared independence during November 1943.

Throughout diverse internal tensions, national defense leadership consistently strove to preserve institutional neutrality and protect communal harmony within society.

Evolution of national defense

French command maintained operational oversight of most personnel until official sovereignty transferred full military responsibility to domestic leaders.

Retired Brigadier General Marcel Baloukji, former head of the army border committee with Syria, detailed key formative historical milestones.

He noted that forces faced their primary conventional combat test during June 1948 clashes near the northern village of al-Malikiyya.

Lebanese soldiers briefly regained control of the disputed settlement, but military leadership subsequently relinquished the position to regional partner forces.

Historians emphasize that the tactical recapture proved temporary before foreign troops established permanent control, reflecting Lebanon's limited overall 1948 engagement.

Decades later, the protracted civil conflict between 1975 and 1990 fractured the armed forces and severely crippled defense coordination.

National reconciliation under the Taif Agreement subsequently enabled units to reintegrate diverse factions while restoring unified command hierarchies across barracks.

Following foreign troop withdrawals in 2005, the institution restored operational cohesion, steadily growing from thousands of personnel to over eighty thousand.

Countering security threats

The armed forces achieved critical tactical breakthroughs during domestic campaigns, eliminating violent insurgent elements situated north-northeast of Tripoli during 2000.

Extensive urban battles around Nahr al-Bared during 2007 further showcased disciplined capabilities against heavily fortified non-state militant factions.

During August 2017, soldiers executed Operation Fajr al-Juroud, successfully clearing entrenched border redoubts along the rugged northeastern frontier boundaries.

These accumulated battlefield successes bolstered public trust, positioning the military as a respected national apparatus capable of reinforcing territorial security.

Baloukji underscored that military discipline remains foundational for maintaining stability despite persistent regional pressures along vital border corridors.

Political analyst Assaad Bechara observed that prolonged foreign dominance and non-state armed competition historically constrained the military's sovereign statutory responsibilities.

Bechara offered cautious warnings regarding complex transitional hurdles facing national forces tasked with establishing undisputed territorial authority nationwide.

He warned that disarming powerful armed groups requires managing delicate communal tensions and strong political opposition within a fragile domestic environment.

Assuming exclusive control of all sovereign territory requires sustained civic consensus alongside robust logistical support for defending sensitive frontier perimeters.

Military leaders must balance domestic peace with defensive mandates while avoiding confrontations that could destabilize intercommunal relations during uncertain political transitions.

Citizens continue seeking unified state defense, expecting the armed forces to navigate institutional risks while safeguarding comprehensive national integrity.

Do you like this article?


Comment Policy