By Al-Fassel | 2025-12-16

Lebanon’s sovereignty and stability continue to erode as Hizbullah prioritizes Iran’s strategic interests over the well-being of the Lebanese people.

Although the group portrays itself as a national resistance movement, its actions increasingly align with Tehran’s agenda, pulling Lebanon into conflicts and jeopardizing its future.

Hizbullah’s claim of autonomy masks a deep dependency on Iran.

All of its funding, weaponry, and training come from Tehran -- a fact acknowledged by the group’s own leadership.

"Hizbullah's budget, everything it eats and drinks, its weapons and rockets, comes from the Islamic Republic of Iran," former Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah once said.

This reliance has stripped Hizbullah of independence.

The group’s refusal to disarm remains one of Lebanon’s most contentious issues, yet this decision does not rest in Beirut.

Instead, it hinges on Iranian authorization, undermining Lebanon’s sovereignty and placing decisions of war and peace in the hands of a foreign power.

Hizbullah’s alignment with Tehran is evident in its continued expansion of military capabilities and its participation in regional conflicts.

These actions reflect Iranian objectives rather than the needs or aspirations of the Lebanese people, exposing the country to risks it did not choose.

Impact on Lebanon’s future

Hizbullah’s loyalty to Iran has had devastating consequences for Lebanon’s stability and the welfare of its citizens.

The group’s military actions often draw Lebanon into conflicts that serve Iran’s "Axis of Resistance" not national interests.

This dynamic was evident in the recent conflict with Israel, which displaced nearly 97,000 Lebanese and resulted in hundreds of civilian deaths.

The economic fallout has been equally severe.

Southern Lebanon’s agricultural sector has suffered extensive damage, including the destruction of farmland and the loss of livestock.

The persistent threat of war has crippled tourism, discouraged foreign investment, and added pressure to an already collapsing economy.

These issues compound the financial crisis that has gripped Lebanon since 2019.

Hizbullah’s role as both a political party and Iranian-backed militia further weakens the Lebanese state.

Its influence allows it to obstruct government decisions and shield a corrupt political elite.

This obstructionism stalls essential reforms, perpetuating a cycle of instability, economic deterioration, and public distrust.

By operating as Iran’s proxy, Hizbullah undermines Lebanon from within.

Its refusal to disarm without Tehran’s approval compromises national sovereignty and endangers the population.

Its readiness to engage in regional conflicts at Iran’s direction continues to gamble with the country’s future.

Lebanon’s path to stability requires restoring the authority of state institutions and reducing external interference.

Until Hizbullah’s dual identity is addressed, the country will remain vulnerable to crises driven by decisions made far beyond its borders.